|Title||Response to Comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2016|
|Authors||Moseley GE, Dublyansky YV, Edwards R L, Wendt KA, Pythoud M, Zhang P, Cheng H, Lu Y, Boch R, Spötl C|
Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.